Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623818
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Bargas-Martinez v. Gonzales
No. 8623818 · Decided August 1, 2006
No. 8623818·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 1, 2006
Citation
No. 8623818
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Sara Bargas-Martinez and Margarito Roman-Rios, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . The Board considered the evidence petitioners submitted concerning their sons’ newly diagnosed psychological conditions and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law.”). Petitioners’ contention that the Board deprived them of due process by failing to consider the evidence cumulatively is not supported by the record. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Sara Bargas-Martinez and Margarito Roman-Rios, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Sara Bargas-Martinez and Margarito Roman-Rios, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
02The Board considered the evidence petitioners submitted concerning their sons’ newly diagnosed psychological conditions and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening.
03INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law.”).
04Petitioners’ contention that the Board deprived them of due process by failing to consider the evidence cumulatively is not supported by the record.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Sara Bargas-Martinez and Margarito Roman-Rios, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Bargas-Martinez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 1, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623818 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.