Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8628837
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Barcenas v. Gonzales
No. 8628837 · Decided February 26, 2007
No. 8628837·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 26, 2007
Citation
No. 8628837
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). A party may file only one motion to reopen removal proceedings, and that motion must be filed not later than ninety days after the date on which the final order of removal was entered. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2). The Board of Immigration Appeals therefore did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s second motion to reopen. Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
03A party may file only one motion to reopen removal proceedings, and that motion must be filed not later than ninety days after the date on which the final order of removal was entered.
04The Board of Immigration Appeals therefore did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s second motion to reopen.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Barcenas v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 26, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8628837 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.