Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646584
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Baochen Xing v. Mukasey
No. 8646584 · Decided December 28, 2007
No. 8646584·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 28, 2007
Citation
No. 8646584
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Baochen Xing, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen and reconsider. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s May 26, 2006, order dismissing Xing’s direct appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision because the petition for review is not timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(1); Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003). Xing has not provided argument on, and has therefore waived any challenge to, the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen and reconsider. See Ghahremani v. Gonzales, 498 F.3d 993, 997-98 (9th Cir.2007). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED IN PART; DENIED IN PART’ This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Baochen Xing, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen and reconsider.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM *** Baochen Xing, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen and reconsider.
02We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
03We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s May 26, 2006, order dismissing Xing’s direct appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision because the petition for review is not timely as to that order.
04Xing has not provided argument on, and has therefore waived any challenge to, the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen and reconsider.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Baochen Xing, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen and reconsider.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Baochen Xing v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 28, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8646584 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.