Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641684
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Balbuena v. Gonzales
No. 8641684 · Decided June 15, 2007
No. 8641684·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 15, 2007
Citation
No. 8641684
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Lauro Placido Balbuena and Eva Placido seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that an applicant has failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003). We do not consider petitioners’ contention regarding physical presence because their failure to establish hardship is dis-positive. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Lauro Placido Balbuena and Eva Placido seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Lauro Placido Balbuena and Eva Placido seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their application for cancellation of removal.
02We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that an applicant has failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative.
03We do not consider petitioners’ contention regarding physical presence because their failure to establish hardship is dis-positive.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Lauro Placido Balbuena and Eva Placido seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s order denying their application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Balbuena v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 15, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641684 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.