Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8926471
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Baca v. Campbell
No. 8926471 · Decided December 20, 1982
No. 8926471·Ninth Circuit · 1982·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 20, 1982
Citation
No. 8926471
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge, specially concurring: I would hold that the remand should be limited to the precise question of whether the post-judgment motion unfairly surprised or prejudiced the appellees. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment, 455 U.S. 445 , at page 454, 102 S.Ct. 1162 , at pages 1167-1168. In passing on the question, the district court might, if it deems it advisable, conduct further proceedings to supplement the record.
Plain English Summary
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge, specially concurring: I would hold that the remand should be limited to the precise question of whether the post-judgment motion unfairly surprised or prejudiced the appellees.
Key Points
01KILKENNY, Circuit Judge, specially concurring: I would hold that the remand should be limited to the precise question of whether the post-judgment motion unfairly surprised or prejudiced the appellees.
02In passing on the question, the district court might, if it deems it advisable, conduct further proceedings to supplement the record.
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge, specially concurring: I would hold that the remand should be limited to the precise question of whether the post-judgment motion unfairly surprised or prejudiced the appellees.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Baca v. Campbell in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 20, 1982.
Use the citation No. 8926471 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.