Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10779988
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ayala v. Bondi
No. 10779988 · Decided January 27, 2026
No. 10779988·Ninth Circuit · 2026·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 27, 2026
Citation
No. 10779988
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARTA BEATRIZ AYALA; et al., No. 21-1438
Agency Nos.
Petitioners, A094-227-258
A215-681-060
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 22, 2026**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Marta Beatriz Ayala, a native and citizen of El Salvador, and her child, a
native and citizen of Guatemala, petition pro se for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s
decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual
findings. Arrey v. Barr, 916 F.3d 1149, 1157 (9th Cir. 2019). We deny the petition
for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determinations that petitioners
did not establish that the governments of El Salvador and Guatemala were or are
unable or unwilling to control the agents of any past or feared persecution. See
Castro-Perez v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 1069, 1072 (9th Cir. 2005) (record did not
compel finding that government was unwilling or unable to control the feared
harm). Thus, petitioners’ asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.
Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection
because petitioners failed to show it is more likely than not they will be tortured by
or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador or
Guatemala. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 21-1438
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026 MOLLY C.
02COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARTA BEATRIZ AYALA; et al., No.
03On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted January 22, 2026** Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R.
04Marta Beatriz Ayala, a native and citizen of El Salvador, and her child, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision d
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ayala v. Bondi in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 27, 2026.
Use the citation No. 10779988 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.