Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642330
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Avoyan v. Gonzales
No. 8642330 · Decided July 27, 2007
No. 8642330·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 27, 2007
Citation
No. 8642330
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the denial of the application for asylum filed by petitioner’s former wife, for which petitioner was a derivative beneficiary. The Immigration Judge found the application abandoned because, after six continuances over a four year period, the petitioner did not submit his fingerprints as required. The record does not support petitioner’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, nor that any such assistance caused petitioner’s failure to submit the required fingerprints. A review of the record and petitioner’s response to the order to show cause indicates the questions raised by this petition *506 for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the denial of the application for asylum filed by petitioner’s former wife, for which petitioner was a derivative beneficiary.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the denial of the application for asylum filed by petitioner’s former wife, for which petitioner was a derivative beneficiary.
02The Immigration Judge found the application abandoned because, after six continuances over a four year period, the petitioner did not submit his fingerprints as required.
03The record does not support petitioner’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, nor that any such assistance caused petitioner’s failure to submit the required fingerprints.
04A review of the record and petitioner’s response to the order to show cause indicates the questions raised by this petition *506 for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review from a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the denial of the application for asylum filed by petitioner’s former wife, for which petitioner was a derivative beneficiary.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Avoyan v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 27, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642330 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.