Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621491
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arroyo-Medina v. Gonzales
No. 8621491 · Decided May 19, 2006
No. 8621491·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8621491
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Ana Patricia Arroyo-Medina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal for failure to satisfy the continuous physical presence requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A). She contends that the immigration judge erred in finding that both her absence for a period of more than 90 days and an administrative voluntary departure upon her attempted return from Mexico interrupted her continuous presence in the United States. Arroyo’s departure from the United States from November 1994 to September 1995 lasted more than 90 days and thus interrupted her continuous presence. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(2). We therefore deny the petition for review. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Ana Patricia Arroyo-Medina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal fo
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Ana Patricia Arroyo-Medina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal fo
02She contends that the immigration judge erred in finding that both her absence for a period of more than 90 days and an administrative voluntary departure upon her attempted return from Mexico interrupted her continuous presence in the Unit
03Arroyo’s departure from the United States from November 1994 to September 1995 lasted more than 90 days and thus interrupted her continuous presence.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Ana Patricia Arroyo-Medina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal fo
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Arroyo-Medina v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621491 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.