FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8999324
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Arizona v. City of Austin

No. 8999324 · Decided August 28, 1991
No. 8999324 · Ninth Circuit · 1991 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 28, 1991
Citation
No. 8999324
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and HUG, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. ORDER The mandate of the United States Supreme Court certified on April 18, 1989, in California v. ARC America Corp., 490 U.S. 93 , 109 S.Ct. 1661 , 104 L.Ed.2d 86 , reversed the judgment of this court. Accordingly, we vacate our opinion at 817 F.2d 1435 (9th Cir.1987), reverse the district court, and remand to the district court for further proceedings which are consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Plain English Summary
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and HUG, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and HUG, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Arizona v. City of Austin in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 28, 1991.
Use the citation No. 8999324 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →