FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630870
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Argueta v. Gonzales

No. 8630870 · Decided April 30, 2007
No. 8630870 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 30, 2007
Citation
No. 8630870
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Hugo Ernesto Ocampo Argueta and Evelia Garcia Montiel, husband and wife, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their fifth motion to reconsider. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. See Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ fifth motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2)(“A party may file only one motion to reconsider any given decision and may not seek reconsideration of a decision denying a previous motion to reconsider.”) We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s underlying order dismissing Petitioners’ direct appeal from the immigration judge’s decision because this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003). *739 PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Hugo Ernesto Ocampo Argueta and Evelia Garcia Montiel, husband and wife, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their fifth motion to reconsider.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Hugo Ernesto Ocampo Argueta and Evelia Garcia Montiel, husband and wife, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their fifth motion to reconsider.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Argueta v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 30, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630870 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →