FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9394520
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Anthony Anderson v. State of Nevada

No. 9394520 · Decided April 26, 2023
No. 9394520 · Ninth Circuit · 2023 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 26, 2023
Citation
No. 9394520
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 26 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANTHONY K. ANDERSON, No. 22-16611 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00127-ART-BNW v. MEMORANDUM* STATE OF NEVADA; CHARLES THOMPSON, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Anne R. Traum, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 17, 2023** Before: CLIFTON, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. Nevada state prisoner Anthony K. Anderson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Brown v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 749-50 (9th Cir. 2009) (Eleventh Amendment * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). immunity); Sadoski v. Mosley, 435 F.3d 1076, 1077 n.1 (9th Cir. 2006) (judicial immunity); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) (failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed Anderson’s action because defendants are immune from suit. See Brown, 554 F.3d at 752 (explaining that the State has Eleventh Amendment immunity); Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072, 1075 (9th Cir. 1986) (a judge is subject to liability only when “he acts in the clear absence of all jurisdiction, or performs an act that is not judicial in nature” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)). Anderson’s motions for injunctive relief (Docket Entry No. 3), appointment of pro bono counsel (Docket Entry No. 4), default judgment (Docket Entry No. 5) and presentation of forensic evidence (Docket Entry No. 11) are denied. Anderson’s motion to file an oversized brief (Docket Entry No. 7) is denied as unnecessary. AFFIRMED. 2 22-16611
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 26 2023 MOLLY C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 26 2023 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Anthony Anderson v. State of Nevada in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 26, 2023.
Use the citation No. 9394520 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →