FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 771677
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Alonso Antonio Barahona Gomez Carmen Victoria Vazquez De Barahona Alonso Antonio Barahona-Vasquez Brenda Verzosa Dino Verzosa Humberto Javier-Rivas Bosco Guillermo Rivas Carole Beltran Santiago Ramon Sequeira Graciela De Los Angeles Isariuz Sandra Los Angeles Sequeira Marta Aguilar v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Executive Office for Immigration Review Michael Creppy, Chief Immigration Judge Paul Schmidt, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Alonso Antonio Barahonagomez Carmen Victoria Vazquez De Barahona Alonso Antonio Barahona-Vasquez Brenda Verzosa Dino Verzosa Humberto Javier-Rivas Bosco Guillermo Rivas Carole Beltran Santiago Ramon Sequeira Graciela De Los Angeles Isariuz Sandra Los Angeles Sequeira Marta Aguilar v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Executive Office for Immigration Review Michael Creppy, Chief Immigration Judge Paul Schmidt, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals

No. 771677 · Decided January 10, 2001
No. 771677 · Ninth Circuit · 2001 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 10, 2001
Citation
No. 771677
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Alonso Antonio Barahona Gomez Carmen Victoria Vazquez De Barahona Alonso Antonio Barahona-Vasquez Brenda Verzosa Dino Verzosa Humberto Javier-Rivas Bosco Guillermo Rivas Carole Beltran Santiago Ramon Sequeira Graciela De Los Angeles Isariuz Sandra Los Angeles Sequeira Marta Aguilar v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Executive Office for Immigration Review Michael Creppy, Chief Immigration Judge Paul Schmidt, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Alonso Antonio Barahonagomez Carmen Victoria Vazquez De Barahona Alonso Antonio Barahona-Vasquez Brenda Verzosa Dino Verzosa Humberto Javier-Rivas Bosco Guillermo Rivas Carole Beltran Santiago Ramon Sequeira Graciela De Los Angeles Isariuz Sandra Los Angeles Sequeira Marta Aguilar v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Executive Office for Immigration Review Michael Creppy, Chief Immigration Judge Paul Schmidt, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Alonso Antonio Barahona Gomez Carmen Victoria Vazquez De Barahona Alonso Antonio Barahona-Vasquez Brenda Verzosa Dino Verzosa Humberto Javier-Rivas Bosco Guillermo Rivas Carole Beltran Santiago Ramon Sequeira Graciela De Los Angeles Isariuz Sandra Los Angeles Sequeira Marta Aguilar v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Executive Office for Immigration Review Michael Creppy, Chief Immigration Judge Paul Schmidt, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Alonso Antonio Barahonagomez Carmen Victoria Vazquez De Barahona Alonso Antonio Barahona-Vasquez Brenda Verzosa Dino Verzosa Humberto Javier-Rivas Bosco Guillermo Rivas Carole Beltran Santiago Ramon Sequeira Graciela De Los Angeles Isariuz Sandra Los Angeles Sequeira Marta Aguilar v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Executive Office for Immigration Review Michael Creppy, Chief Immigration Judge Paul Schmidt, Chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 10, 2001.
Use the citation No. 771677 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →