Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627054
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ali v. Gonzales
No. 8627054 · Decided December 15, 2006
No. 8627054·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 15, 2006
Citation
No. 8627054
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Shabana Azmin Ali, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s denial of her application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), and we deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision that petitioner failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution because she did not flee Fiji to seek asylum, she experienced only harassment while living in Fiji as opposed to persecution, and there is no evidence in the record to support an objectively reasonable fear of persecution. See Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 339-40 (9th Cir.1995); see also Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, we deny petitioner’s asylum claim. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Shabana Azmin Ali, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s denial of her application for asylum.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Shabana Azmin Ali, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s denial of her application for asylum.
02812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), and we deny the petition for review.
03Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision that petitioner failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution because she did not flee Fiji to seek asylum, she experienced only harassment while living in
04INS, 47 F.3d 336, 339-40 (9th Cir.1995); see also Nagoulko v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Shabana Azmin Ali, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s denial of her application for asylum.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Ali v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 15, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627054 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.