Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8631145
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Aleman v. Gonzales
No. 8631145 · Decided May 14, 2007
No. 8631145·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 14, 2007
Citation
No. 8631145
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because petitioner’s motion to reopen before the Board of Immigration Appeals violated the numerical limitations on motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2) (providing that a party may file only one motion to reopen proceedings after a final administrative decision was filed). Thus, the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because petitioner’s motion to reopen before the Board of Immigration Appeals violated the numerical limitations on motions to reopen.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because petitioner’s motion to reopen before the Board of Immigration Appeals violated the numerical limitations on motions to reopen.
02§ 1003.2 (c)(2) (providing that a party may file only one motion to reopen proceedings after a final administrative decision was filed).
03Thus, the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because petitioner’s motion to reopen before the Board of Immigration Appeals violated the numerical limitations on motions to reopen.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Aleman v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 14, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8631145 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.