FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 688705
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. San Francisco Unified School District, and United States Department of Education Lamar Alexander, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Education, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Francisco Unified School District San Francisco Unified School District, Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California, and Deborah Martin Jacob Perea Barbara Perea, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. William Honig, as California Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California State Board of Education, and San Francisco Unified School District, Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Francisco Unified School District, United States Department of Education Deborah Martin Lamar Alexander, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Education Jacob Perea Barbara Perea, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees

No. 688705 · Decided January 30, 1995
No. 688705 · Ninth Circuit · 1995 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 30, 1995
Citation
No. 688705
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. San Francisco Unified School District, and United States Department of Education Lamar Alexander, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Education, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Francisco Unified School District San Francisco Unified School District, Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California, and Deborah Martin Jacob Perea Barbara Perea, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. William Honig, as California Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California State Board of Education, and San Francisco Unified School District, Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Francisco Unified School District, United States Department of Education Deborah Martin Lamar Alexander, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Education Jacob Perea Barbara Perea, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. San Francisco Unified School District, and United States Department of Education Lamar Alexander, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Education, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Francisco Unified School District San Francisco Unified School District, Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California, and Deborah Martin Jacob Perea Barbara Perea, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants. Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. William Honig, as California Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California State Board of Education, and San Francisco Unified School District, Albert C. Walker Roberta M. Walker John C. Soso Jacklyn C. Soso Margaret Smith Alyce Crosdale Betty Sands v. Board of Education of the San Francisco Unified School District San Francisco Unified School District, City and County of San Francisco, State of California Ramon Cortines, Superintendent of Schools, San Francisco Unified School District, United States Department of Education Deborah Martin Lamar Alexander, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Education Jacob Perea Barbara Perea, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 30, 1995.
Use the citation No. 688705 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →