Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8646804
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Alarcon v. Mukasey
No. 8646804 · Decided January 8, 2008
No. 8646804·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
January 8, 2008
Citation
No. 8646804
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Enrique Alarcon seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision to deny Alarcon’s application for cancellation of removal as a matter of discretion. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003) (stating the court lacks jurisdiction to consider “all discretionary decisions involved in the cancellation of removal context, including the ultimate discretionary decision to deny relief’); see also Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592 , 599-600 & n. 5 (9th Cir.2006) (stating the court does not have jurisdiction to consider the ultimate discretionary decision to deny relief). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Enrique Alarcon seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Enrique Alarcon seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal.
02We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision to deny Alarcon’s application for cancellation of removal as a matter of discretion.
03Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003) (stating the court lacks jurisdiction to consider “all discretionary decisions involved in the cancellation of removal context, including the ultimate discretionary decision to deny relief’); see a
045 (9th Cir.2006) (stating the court does not have jurisdiction to consider the ultimate discretionary decision to deny relief).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Enrique Alarcon seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Alarcon v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 8, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8646804 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.