Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8626301
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Alaniz v. Gonzales
No. 8626301 · Decided November 30, 2006
No. 8626301·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 30, 2006
Citation
No. 8626301
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Ramos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the petition for review. *585 We lack jurisdiction to consider Ramos’s challenge to the BIA’s discretionary determination that he failed to demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying children. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir. 2003). We similarly lack jurisdiction over Ramos’s contention that the IJ denied him due process because the IJ abandoned his role as a neutral fact finder. Ramos did not raise this issue before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (d)(1); Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 676-78 (9th Cir.2004). DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Ramos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Ramos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal.
02Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the petition for review.
03*585 We lack jurisdiction to consider Ramos’s challenge to the BIA’s discretionary determination that he failed to demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying children.
04We similarly lack jurisdiction over Ramos’s contention that the IJ denied him due process because the IJ abandoned his role as a neutral fact finder.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Ramos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Alaniz v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 30, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8626301 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.