Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621509
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Addo v. Carlson
No. 8621509 · Decided May 19, 2006
No. 8621509·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8621509
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Ali H. Addo, a native and citizen of Somalia, appeals pro se from the district *670 court’s summary judgment for the District Director and Examiner of the San Francisco Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his action alleging that his status should be changed from lawful permanent resident to naturalized citizen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Buono v. Norton, 371 F.3d 543, 545 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants because Addo merely challenged the merits of his pending naturalization application. See Bellajaro v. Schiltgen, 378 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir.2004) (district courts only have jurisdiction to review a final agency decision and may not make a determination on the merits of a naturalization petition in the first instance, with one exception that does not apply here). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Addo, a native and citizen of Somalia, appeals pro se from the district *670 court’s summary judgment for the District Director and Examiner of the San Francisco Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his action alleging that hi
Key Points
01Addo, a native and citizen of Somalia, appeals pro se from the district *670 court’s summary judgment for the District Director and Examiner of the San Francisco Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his action alleging that hi
02The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants because Addo merely challenged the merits of his pending naturalization application.
03Schiltgen, 378 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir.2004) (district courts only have jurisdiction to review a final agency decision and may not make a determination on the merits of a naturalization petition in the first instance, with one exception th
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
Addo, a native and citizen of Somalia, appeals pro se from the district *670 court’s summary judgment for the District Director and Examiner of the San Francisco Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his action alleging that hi
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Addo v. Carlson in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621509 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.