Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8641612
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Acevedo Urbina v. Gonzales
No. 8641612 · Decided June 14, 2007
No. 8641612·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 14, 2007
Citation
No. 8641612
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Araceli Acevedo Urbino, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the denial of her application for cancellation of removal for lack of a qualifying relative (8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D)). She contends that the qualifying relative requirement violates due process and equal protection. Acevedo’s constitutional claims are foreclosed. See Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that placing aliens in removal, rather than deportation, proceedings does not by itself amount to a due process violation); Hernandez-Mezquita v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 1161, 1163-65 (9th Cir.2002) (no equal protection violation arising from placing aliens in removal rather than deportation proceedings). The issuance of our mandate shall be stayed for 60 days from the filing of our disposition of the petition for review. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Araceli Acevedo Urbino, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the denial of her application for cancellation of removal for lack of a qualifying relative (8 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Araceli Acevedo Urbino, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the denial of her application for cancellation of removal for lack of a qualifying relative (8 U.S.C.
02She contends that the qualifying relative requirement violates due process and equal protection.
03Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that placing aliens in removal, rather than deportation, proceedings does not by itself amount to a due process violation); Hernandez-Mezquita v.
04Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 1161, 1163-65 (9th Cir.2002) (no equal protection violation arising from placing aliens in removal rather than deportation proceedings).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Araceli Acevedo Urbino, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the denial of her application for cancellation of removal for lack of a qualifying relative (8 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Acevedo Urbina v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 14, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8641612 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.