FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8628891
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Abella v. Gonzales

No. 8628891 · Decided February 27, 2007
No. 8628891 · Ninth Circuit · 2007 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 27, 2007
Citation
No. 8628891
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Fely C. Abella, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592 , 600 & n. 7 (9th Cir.2006) (this court has jurisdiction to review cases “in which the BIA rules that a motion to reopen fails to satisfy procedural standards”). We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. See Konstantinova v. INS, 195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir.1999). We deny the petition for review. The BIA acted within its discretion in denying the motion to reopen because petitioner failed to submit new or previously unavailable evidence of her eligibility for suspension of deportation. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2 (a) & (c); Bhasin v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d 977, 984 (9th Cir.2005). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Abella, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Abella, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Abella v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 27, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8628891 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →