Home/Case Law/Ninth Circuit/96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6178, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,118 Attorneys Trust, and Cmc Magnetics Corporation AKA Cmc, a Republic of China Corporation, Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Videotape Computer Products, Inc., for Itself & Dba Video Computer Products, Inc., and Videotape Products, Inc., Cross-Claimant-Appellee
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 724947
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6178, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,118 Attorneys Trust, and Cmc Magnetics Corporation AKA Cmc, a Republic of China Corporation, Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Videotape Computer Products, Inc., for Itself & Dba Video Computer Products, Inc., and Videotape Products, Inc., Cross-Claimant-Appellee
No. 724947 · Decided August 20, 1996
No. 724947·Ninth Circuit · 1996·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 20, 1996
Citation
No. 724947
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6178, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,118 Attorneys Trust, and Cmc Magnetics Corporation AKA Cmc, a Republic of China Corporation, Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Videotape Computer Products, Inc., for Itself & Dba Video Computer Products, Inc., and Videotape Products, Inc., Cross-Claimant-Appellee is a decision of the Ninth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6178, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,118 Attorneys Trust, and Cmc Magnetics Corporation AKA Cmc, a Republic of China Corporation, Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Videotape Computer Products, Inc., for Itself & Dba Video Computer Products, Inc., and Videotape Products, Inc., Cross-Claimant-Appellee in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 20, 1996.
Use the citation No. 724947 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.