FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10379046
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Yasmani Rubio v. City of Alexandria, Virginia

No. 10379046 · Decided April 14, 2025
No. 10379046 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
April 14, 2025
Citation
No. 10379046
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1621 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1621 YASMANI GURRI RUBIO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA; JUSTIN M. WILSON, Mayor in his individual capacity; ADP CODY SAVAGE, in his individual capacity; ADP MICHAEL ROCHE, in his individual capacity; ADP ROBERT POND, in his individual capacity; ADP JAMIE BRIDGEMAN, in his individual capacity; CHIEF OF ALEXANDRIA POLICE, in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00193-DJN) Submitted: December 13, 2024 Decided: April 14, 2025 Before AGEE and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yasmani Gurri Rubio, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1621 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/14/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant Yasmani Gurri Rubio appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Appellant’s motion to file a supplemental brief, we deny as moot his motions to expedite and accelerate case processing, deny his remaining motions—including his motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute—and affirm the district court’s order. Rubio v. City of Alexandria, No. 3:24-cv-00193-DJN (E.D. Va. June 17, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1621 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1621 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Yasmani Rubio v. City of Alexandria, Virginia in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 14, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10379046 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →