Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10333700
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
William Farley v. CMFG LIfe Insurance Company
No. 10333700 · Decided February 13, 2025
No. 10333700·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
February 13, 2025
Citation
No. 10333700
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1635 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/13/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1635
WILLIAM HARRISON FARLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CMFG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a Cuna Mutual,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Lynchburg. Robert S. Ballou, District Judge. (6:22-cv-00024-RSB)
Submitted: January 31, 2025 Decided: February 13, 2025
Before AGEE, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Thomas E. Strelka, Brittany M. Haddox, STRELKA LAW OFFICE, PC,
Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Kevin D. Holden, Richmond, Virginia, John Tucker
Woodson, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Madison, Wisconsin, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1635 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/13/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William Harrison Farley appeals the district court’s order awarding summary
judgment to CMFG Life Insurance Company on Farley’s retaliatory termination claim
under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. * After
a thorough review of the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we discern no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Farley v. CMFG Life
Ins. Co., No. 6:22-cv-00024-RSB (W.D. Va. May 24, 2023). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The district court also awarded summary judgment to the defendant on Farley’s
age discrimination claim. Farley does not challenge that ruling on appeal.
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1635 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/13/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 23-1635 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/13/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
02CMFG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a Cuna Mutual, Defendant - Appellee.
03(6:22-cv-00024-RSB) Submitted: January 31, 2025 Decided: February 13, 2025 Before AGEE, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
04Haddox, STRELKA LAW OFFICE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1635 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/13/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for William Farley v. CMFG LIfe Insurance Company in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 13, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10333700 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.