FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10803751
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

William Custis v. Accomack County Sheriff's Office

No. 10803751 · Decided March 3, 2026
No. 10803751 · Fourth Circuit · 2026 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
March 3, 2026
Citation
No. 10803751
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6273 Doc: 21 Filed: 03/03/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6273 WILLIAM PARKE CUSTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ACCOMACK COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; WAYNE GREER, Lt. ACSO; DONNIE WILLIAMS, Sgt. ACSO; KING, Sgt. ACSO; AMBER MARTIN, Cpl. ACSO; JOHN DOE, Administrator AC JDR Court Services; ROLAND C. LEIGHTON, AC JDR Court Clerk; BRANDIE KUNTZ, JDR Deputy Clerk; BRENDA DIZE, JDR Deputy Clerk; KELSEY WILLIAMS, JDR Deputy Clerk; ACCOMACK COUNTY JUVENILE AND DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT SERVICES UNIT; ACCOMACK COUNTY JDR CLERK’S OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00141-DJN-MRC) Submitted: February 26, 2026 Decided: March 3, 2026 Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Parke Custis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6273 Doc: 21 Filed: 03/03/2026 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William Parke Custis appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failing to comply with the court’s order to file a particularized complaint. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Custis v. Accomack Cnty. Sheriff’s Off., No. 3:24-cv-00141-DJN-MRC (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6273 Doc: 21 Filed: 03/03/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6273 Doc: 21 Filed: 03/03/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for William Custis v. Accomack County Sheriff's Office in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 3, 2026.
Use the citation No. 10803751 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →