Home/Case Law/Fourth Circuit/Virgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr. v. Nathan Rice Rufus Edmisten, Attorney General of N.C., (Three Cases). Virgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr. v. Nathan A. Rice, Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 461225
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Virgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr. v. Nathan Rice Rufus Edmisten, Attorney General of N.C., (Three Cases). Virgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr. v. Nathan A. Rice, Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General
No. 461225 · Decided November 15, 1985
No. 461225·Fourth Circuit · 1985·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
November 15, 1985
Citation
No. 461225
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Virgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr. v. Nathan Rice Rufus Edmisten, Attorney General of N.C., (Three Cases). Virgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr. v. Nathan A. Rice, Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General is a decision of the Fourth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Virgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr. v. Nathan Rice Rufus Edmisten, Attorney General of N.C., (Three Cases). Virgil Mayo Sanderson, Sr. v. Nathan A. Rice, Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 15, 1985.
Use the citation No. 461225 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.