FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10370711
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Tyrell Saunders

No. 10370711 · Decided March 31, 2025
No. 10370711 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
March 31, 2025
Citation
No. 10370711
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6902 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-6902 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRELL SAUNDERS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cr-00242-1) Submitted: March 27, 2025 Decided: March 31, 2025 Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrell Keoni Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6902 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/31/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Tyrell Keoni Saunders appeals the district court’s order denying him a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines. “We review a district court’s decision [whether] to reduce a sentence under [18 U.S.C.] § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion and its ruling as to the scope of its legal authority under § 3582(c)(2) de novo.” United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013). Our review of the record reveals no error. The court correctly determined that Saunders was eligible for a reduction based on Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines and clearly understood its authority to reduce Saunders’s sentence but declined to grant a reduction based on its review of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6902 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6902 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Tyrell Saunders in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 31, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10370711 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →