FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10594988
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Stephan Cotterrell

No. 10594988 · Decided May 28, 2025
No. 10594988 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
May 28, 2025
Citation
No. 10594988
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6633 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/28/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-6633 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEPHAN COTTERRELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cr-00063-TSK-MJA-1) Submitted: May 19, 2025 Decided: May 28, 2025 Before AGEE, WYNN, and BERNER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephan Cotterrell, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6633 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/28/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Stephan Cotterrell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. During the pendency of this appeal, however, Cotterrell completed his term of imprisonment and was released from incarceration. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See Fleet Feet, Inc. v. NIKE, Inc., 986 F.3d 458, 463 (4th Cir. 2021) (“If an event occurs during the pendency of an appeal that makes it impossible for a court to grant effective relief to a prevailing party, then the appeal must be dismissed as moot.” (internal quotation marks omitted)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6633 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/28/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6633 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/28/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Stephan Cotterrell in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 28, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10594988 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →