FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10607130
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Richard Kayian

No. 10607130 · Decided June 16, 2025
No. 10607130 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
June 16, 2025
Citation
No. 10607130
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6681 Doc: 6 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-6681 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICHARD HENRY KAYIAN, a/k/a Pops, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cr-00041-JPJ-1) Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 16, 2025 Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Henry Kayian, Appellant Pro Se. Lee Samuel Brett, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6681 Doc: 6 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Richard Henry Kayian appeals the district court’s order denying his most recent 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motions for compassionate release. Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Kayian’s motions. United States v. Centeno-Morales, 90 F.4th 274, 280 (4th Cir. 2024) (providing standard of review). Specifically, while short, the appealed-from order incorporated by reference the court’s prior order—issued nearly three months earlier—in which the court thoroughly considered Kayian’s health-based arguments and denied Kayian’s counseled motion for compassionate release. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Kayian, No. 1:16-cr-00041-JPJ-1 (W.D. Va. June 25, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6681 Doc: 6 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6681 Doc: 6 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Richard Kayian in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 16, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10607130 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →