FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10781474
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Kyle Thompson

No. 10781474 · Decided January 28, 2026
No. 10781474 · Fourth Circuit · 2026 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
January 28, 2026
Citation
No. 10781474
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6129 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/28/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6129 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KYLE STEPHEN THOMPSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:17-cr-00195-TDC-1; 8:24-cv-01986-TDC) Submitted: January 22, 2026 Decided: January 28, 2026 Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kyle Stephen Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. David Christian Bornstein, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6129 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/28/2026 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kyle Thompson seeks to appeal the district courts orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and denying Thompson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thompson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6129 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/28/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6129 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/28/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Kyle Thompson in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 28, 2026.
Use the citation No. 10781474 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →