Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 736519
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. George Harris, A/K/A "George", A/K/A Mr. G, A/K/A "G"
No. 736519 · Decided February 26, 1997
No. 736519·Fourth Circuit · 1997·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
February 26, 1997
Citation
No. 736519
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
107 F.3d 868 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George HARRIS, a/k/a "George", a/k/a Mr. G, a/k/a "G", Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-6881. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 13, 1997. Decided Feb. 26, 1997. George Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee. Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. * United States v. Harris, Nos. CR-88-76-N; CA-95-789-N (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 1995; May 14, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED * We note that subsequent to the district court's order in this case, the Supreme Court has held that criminal prosecutions which follow civil forfeitures are not barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause. See United States v. Ussery, --- U.S. ---, 64 U.S.L.W. 4565 , 4572 (U.S. June 24, 1996) (Nos.95-345/346)
Plain English Summary
107 F.3d 868 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished d
Key Points
01107 F.3d 868 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished d
02Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.
03Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
04PER CURIAM: 1 Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.
Frequently Asked Questions
107 F.3d 868 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished d
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. George Harris, A/K/A "George", A/K/A Mr. G, A/K/A "G" in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 26, 1997.
Use the citation No. 736519 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.