Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10615077
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. Dyvae Davis
No. 10615077 · Decided June 20, 2025
No. 10615077·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
June 20, 2025
Citation
No. 10615077
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-7092 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-7092
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DYVAE DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Elizabeth City. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (2:22-cr-00010-M-RN-1)
Submitted: June 17, 2025 Decided: June 20, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and BERNER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dyvae Davis, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-7092 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/20/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Dyvae Davis appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
motion for a sentence reduction. Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in
Davis’s informal brief, we have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion. *
United States v. Spruhan, 989 F.3d 266, 269 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review);
see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal
brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues
preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
*
To the extent Davis seeks to challenge the validity of his 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
conviction, he did not properly preserve that challenge for this appeal.
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-7092 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 24-7092 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
02(2:22-cr-00010-M-RN-1) Submitted: June 17, 2025 Decided: June 20, 2025 Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and BERNER, Circuit Judges.
03Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
04Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-7092 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Dyvae Davis in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 20, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10615077 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.