Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10781993
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Tyrone Young v. D. Young
No. 10781993 · Decided January 29, 2026
No. 10781993·Fourth Circuit · 2026·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
January 29, 2026
Citation
No. 10781993
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6342 Doc: 29 Filed: 01/29/2026 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6342
TYRONE YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN D. L. YOUNG, (FCI Beckley); WARDEN HECKARD, (FCI Beckley);
B. L. FAIN, (Head of Medical); MS. FOX, (Head of Medical); DOCTOR ROGER
EDWARDS; P/A JOE COOPER; “MAT” DR. HODOVAN, FNP; NURSE LAW;
NURSE TILEY; NURSE THOMPSON; (COUNSULAR) BURDETTE; (UNIT
MANAGER) MS. STAPLES; (CASE MANAGER) MR. HARLESS;
(PSYCHOLOGIST) DR. WHITED; (CASE MANAGER) MR. CRADDOCK;
(ALES) SHIFLET, Pharmacist; (COUNSULAR) MILAM; MS. E. STENNETT,
Unit Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Beckley. Frank W. Volk, Chief District Judge. (5:23-cv-00088)
Submitted: January 22, 2026 Decided: January 29, 2026
Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6342 Doc: 29 Filed: 01/29/2026 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Young appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion to vacate the court’s prior judgment accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on Young’s complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Before
addressing the merits of the appeal, we grant Young’s motion to supplement his informal
brief. In addition, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny Young’s pending motions to amend and supplement the record, and we affirm the
district court’s order. Young v. Young, No. 5:23-cv-00088 (S.D. W. Va. Apr. 14, 2025).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6342 Doc: 29 Filed: 01/29/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 25-6342 Doc: 29 Filed: 01/29/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
02FOX, (Head of Medical); DOCTOR ROGER EDWARDS; P/A JOE COOPER; “MAT” DR.