FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10676330
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Thomas Ford v. Daniel Driscoll

No. 10676330 · Decided September 22, 2025
No. 10676330 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
September 22, 2025
Citation
No. 10676330
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1311 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/22/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1311 THOMAS L. FORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANIEL P. DRISCOLL, Secretary of the Army, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:24-cv-00362-JAG) Submitted: September 18, 2025 Decided: September 22, 2025 Before THACKER and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas L. Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1311 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/22/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas L. Ford appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss Ford’s multiple employment-related claims, including claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, the American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634, the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 to 2654, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 to 796l.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See, e.g., Shipton v. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co., 109 F.4th 701, 709 (4th Cir. 2024) (observing that a plaintiff seeking redress under the FMLA must bring suit, at the latest, within three years of the challenged action); Walton v. Marker, 33 F.4th 165, 172 (4th Cir. 2022) (“[A] plaintiff must exhaust [his Title VII and ADEA] administrative remedies by bringing a charge with the EEOC.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Ford v. Driscoll, No. 3:24-cv- 00362-JAG (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2024; Feb. 5, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Ford has filed a motion for the appointment of counsel, and we deny that motion. 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1311 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/22/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1311 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/22/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Thomas Ford v. Daniel Driscoll in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 22, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10676330 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →