Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10626858
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Scott Reich v. Arnett Coleman
No. 10626858 · Decided July 9, 2025
No. 10626858·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
July 9, 2025
Citation
No. 10626858
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6183 Doc: 34 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6183
SCOTT RANDALL REICH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. ARNETT COLEMAN; P.A. MARK DOWNS; P.A. LEMKE; DR. CLIFTON
CURTIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:23-ct-03241-BO)
Submitted: July 7, 2025 Decided: July 9, 2025
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott Randall Reich, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Jansen Banfield, HARRIS, CREECH,
WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6183 Doc: 34 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Scott Randall Reich seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for
reconsideration of its order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Reich seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny the pending
motion and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6183 Doc: 34 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 25-6183 Doc: 34 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
02(5:23-ct-03241-BO) Submitted: July 7, 2025 Decided: July 9, 2025 Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
03Christina Jansen Banfield, HARRIS, CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee.
04Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6183 Doc: 34 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Scott Reich v. Arnett Coleman in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 9, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10626858 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.