FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10626858
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Scott Reich v. Arnett Coleman

No. 10626858 · Decided July 9, 2025
No. 10626858 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
July 9, 2025
Citation
No. 10626858
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6183 Doc: 34 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6183 SCOTT RANDALL REICH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. ARNETT COLEMAN; P.A. MARK DOWNS; P.A. LEMKE; DR. CLIFTON CURTIS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:23-ct-03241-BO) Submitted: July 7, 2025 Decided: July 9, 2025 Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott Randall Reich, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Jansen Banfield, HARRIS, CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6183 Doc: 34 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Scott Randall Reich seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Reich seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6183 Doc: 34 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6183 Doc: 34 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Scott Reich v. Arnett Coleman in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 9, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10626858 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →