FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10325469
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Saul Vega v. Joseph Canestraro

No. 10325469 · Decided January 31, 2025
No. 10325469 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
January 31, 2025
Citation
No. 10325469
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6723 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-6723 SAUL VEGA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOSEPH CANESTRARO; BRYAN GAUS; ERIC GORDON; RHONDA L. WADE; MARSHALL COUNTY COMMISSIONER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:23-cv-00208-GMG) Submitted: October 1, 2024 Decided: January 31, 2025 Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Saul Vega, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas E. Buck, Benjamin Paul Visnic, BAILEY & WYANT PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6723 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/31/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Saul Vega seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to voluntarily dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545- 46 (1949). The order Vega seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6723 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6723 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Saul Vega v. Joseph Canestraro in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 31, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10325469 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →