Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10607150
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Sarahia Benn v. Rebecca Herr
No. 10607150 · Decided June 16, 2025
No. 10607150·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
June 16, 2025
Citation
No. 10607150
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1375 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1375
SARAHIA BENN,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
REBECCA A. HERR,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Brendan A. Hurson, District Judge. (1:24-cv-00746-BAH)
Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 16, 2025
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sarahia Benn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1375 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Sarahia Benn appeals the district court’s order denying her motions for a temporary
restraining order and a preliminary injunction. Absent extraordinary circumstances not
present here, we lack jurisdiction to consider the denial of a motion for a temporary
restraining order, see Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976),
we dismiss this portion of Benn’s appeal. As to the denial of Benn’s request for a
preliminary injunction, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. W. Pocahontas Props. Ltd. P’ship, 918 F.3d 353, 366
(4th Cir. 2019) (providing preliminary injunction standards). We therefore affirm the
portion of the district court’s order denying Benn’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
Benn v. Hurr, No. 1:24-cv-00746-BAH (D. Md. Mar. 19, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART,
DISMISSED IN PART
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1375 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 24-1375 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
02(1:24-cv-00746-BAH) Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 16, 2025 Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
03Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
04Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1375 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Sarahia Benn v. Rebecca Herr in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 16, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10607150 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.