FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10607150
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Sarahia Benn v. Rebecca Herr

No. 10607150 · Decided June 16, 2025
No. 10607150 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
June 16, 2025
Citation
No. 10607150
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1375 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1375 SARAHIA BENN, Debtor - Appellant, v. REBECCA A. HERR, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Brendan A. Hurson, District Judge. (1:24-cv-00746-BAH) Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 16, 2025 Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sarahia Benn, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1375 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Sarahia Benn appeals the district court’s order denying her motions for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction. Absent extraordinary circumstances not present here, we lack jurisdiction to consider the denial of a motion for a temporary restraining order, see Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976), we dismiss this portion of Benn’s appeal. As to the denial of Benn’s request for a preliminary injunction, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. W. Pocahontas Props. Ltd. P’ship, 918 F.3d 353, 366 (4th Cir. 2019) (providing preliminary injunction standards). We therefore affirm the portion of the district court’s order denying Benn’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Benn v. Hurr, No. 1:24-cv-00746-BAH (D. Md. Mar. 19, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1375 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1375 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/16/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Sarahia Benn v. Rebecca Herr in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 16, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10607150 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →