FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10356979
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Roger Smith v. R. Brown

No. 10356979 · Decided March 14, 2025
No. 10356979 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
March 14, 2025
Citation
No. 10356979
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6637 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-6637 ROGER LEE SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN R. BROWN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:24-cv-00072-JPB-JPM) Submitted: March 11, 2025 Decided: March 14, 2025 Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6637 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/14/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Roger Lee Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged the execution of his sentence, arguing that the Bureau of Prisons improperly refused to apply time he served on his state sentence toward his federal sentence. Confining our review to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”), we have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Smith v. Brown, No. 5:24-cv-00072-JPB-JPM (N.D. W. Va. May 9, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6637 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6637 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Roger Smith v. R. Brown in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 14, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10356979 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →