FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10650564
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Oscar Perez v. Ronnie Huneycutt

No. 10650564 · Decided August 7, 2025
No. 10650564 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
August 7, 2025
Citation
No. 10650564
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6645 Doc: 15 Filed: 08/07/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-6645 OSCAR PEREZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RONNIE LANE HUNEYCUTT; ERIC DYE, Deputy Warden; JEFFREY DUNCAN, Deputy Warden; DARREN DAVES, Green Unit Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (5:22-cv-00076-MR) Submitted: June 30, 2025 Decided: August 7, 2025 Before RICHARDSON and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Oscar Perez, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6645 Doc: 15 Filed: 08/07/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Oscar Perez appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Appellees on his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and striking his proposed surreply. Preliminarily, we grant Perez’s motion for leave to file a supplemental informal brief, but we deny his motion for assignment of counsel. We have reviewed the record in the light most favorable to Perez and find no reversible error in the district court’s grant of summary judgment. See Dean v. Jones, 984 F.3d 295, 301 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Nor do we discern any abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to strike Perez’s unauthorized surreply. See FDIC v. Cashion, 720 F.3d 169, 176 (4th Cir. 2013) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Perez v. Huneycutt, No. 5:22-cv-00076-MR (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6645 Doc: 15 Filed: 08/07/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6645 Doc: 15 Filed: 08/07/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Oscar Perez v. Ronnie Huneycutt in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 7, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10650564 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →