FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 377121
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Norfolk and Western Railway Company Eastern Railroads: The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company, Boston & Maine Corporation, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company, Delaware & Hudson Railway Company, Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Company, Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Company, Grand Trunk Western Railway System, Norfolk & Western Railway Company, the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company, Western Maryland Railway Company Southern Railroads: The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, Central of Georgia Railroad Company, the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Tex. Pac. Ry. Co., Clinchfield Railroad, Florida East Coast Railway Company, Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, Southern Railway Company Western Railroads: The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc., Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. Railroad Company, the Colorado & Southern Railway Company, the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Company, Fort Worth & Denver Railway Company, the Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, St. Louis-San Francisco Railway, St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, the Western Pacific Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America

No. 377121 · Decided April 14, 1980
No. 377121 · Fourth Circuit · 1980 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
April 14, 1980
Citation
No. 377121
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Norfolk and Western Railway Company Eastern Railroads: The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company, Boston & Maine Corporation, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company, Delaware & Hudson Railway Company, Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Company, Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Company, Grand Trunk Western Railway System, Norfolk & Western Railway Company, the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company, Western Maryland Railway Company Southern Railroads: The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, Central of Georgia Railroad Company, the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Tex. Pac. Ry. Co., Clinchfield Railroad, Florida East Coast Railway Company, Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, Southern Railway Company Western Railroads: The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc., Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. Railroad Company, the Colorado & Southern Railway Company, the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Company, Fort Worth & Denver Railway Company, the Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, St. Louis-San Francisco Railway, St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, the Western Pacific Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America is a decision of the Fourth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Norfolk and Western Railway Company Eastern Railroads: The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company, Boston & Maine Corporation, the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad Company, Delaware & Hudson Railway Company, Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad Company, Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Company, Grand Trunk Western Railway System, Norfolk & Western Railway Company, the Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company, Western Maryland Railway Company Southern Railroads: The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company, Central of Georgia Railroad Company, the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Tex. Pac. Ry. Co., Clinchfield Railroad, Florida East Coast Railway Company, Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, Southern Railway Company Western Railroads: The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc., Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pac. Railroad Company, the Colorado & Southern Railway Company, the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Company, Fort Worth & Denver Railway Company, the Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, St. Louis-San Francisco Railway, St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, the Western Pacific Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 14, 1980.
Use the citation No. 377121 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →