FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10767569
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Mary Barlow v. Pete Hegseth

No. 10767569 · Decided December 30, 2025
No. 10767569 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
December 30, 2025
Citation
No. 10767569
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1303 Doc: 27 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1303 MARY BARLOW, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PETE HEGSETH, Secretary, Department of Defense, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00104-LMB-IDD) Submitted: December 23, 2025 Decided: December 30, 2025 Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. ON BRIEF: Jay Kyler, KYLER LAW, LLC, Williamsburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Erik S. Siebert, United States Attorney, Kirstin K. O’Connor, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1303 Doc: 27 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Mary Barlow appeals the district court’s orders (1) granting in part and denying in part the Department of Defense Secretary’s (“DOD”) motion to dismiss and for summary judgment on Barlow’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 to 796l; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17; and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634; and (2) granting DOD summary judgment on Barlow’s remaining ADEA discrimination claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders, Barlow v. Hegseth, No. 1:23-cv-00104-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. June 23, 2023; Feb. 9, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1303 Doc: 27 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1303 Doc: 27 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mary Barlow v. Pete Hegseth in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 30, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10767569 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →