FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10665521
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Mark Eastham v. Robert Sharpe

No. 10665521 · Decided September 2, 2025
No. 10665521 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
September 2, 2025
Citation
No. 10665521
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1944 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1944 MARK EASTHAM; PETER SPARK, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. ROBERT PAUL SHARPE, Defendant - Appellant, and ALGERNON LEE BUTLER, III, Chapter 7 Trustee for Port City Contracting Services, Inc., Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:24-mc-00003-D) Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 2, 2025 Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1944 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 2 of 3 Robert Paul Sharpe, Appellant Pro Se. John Charles Bircher, III, DAVIS HARTMAN WRIGHT PLLC, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 USCA4 Appeal: 24-1944 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Robert Paul Sharpe seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to withdraw the reference of an adversary proceeding to the bankruptcy court and denying his motion for reconsideration. Sharpe also filed a motion and a supplemental motion to consolidate this appeal with two other appeals he has pending in this court. We deny the motions to consolidate these appeals. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Sharpe seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1944 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1944 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mark Eastham v. Robert Sharpe in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 2, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10665521 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →