FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10661911
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Mack Davis v. Susan Stafford

No. 10661911 · Decided August 26, 2025
No. 10661911 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
August 26, 2025
Citation
No. 10661911
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6292 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/26/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6292 MACK ALLEN DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUSAN STAFFORD, Major; LT. B. SMALLS; SGT. SANDY LOWE; OFC. JOEL DIXION, Unit Manager; CPL. SHELA FLAVO, Unit Manager; LPL. MS. JACKSON, Unit Manager; LCPL. CANWRIGHT, Unit Manager; J. REUBEN LONG DETENTION, J.R.L.; OFC. HALE, Unit Manager, Defendants - Appellees, and ELIZABETH LAWSON, Health Service Admin.; DR. STEVE GARMAN, Medical Director; FUTRELL OFC., Officer at J.R.L., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Jacquelyn Denise Austin, District Judge. (8:24-cv-05429-JDA-WSB) Submitted: August 21, 2025 Decided: August 26, 2025 Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6292 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/26/2025 Pg: 2 of 3 Mack Allen Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 USCA4 Appeal: 25-6292 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/26/2025 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Mack Allen Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge, denying Davis’s motion for a temporary restraining order, and dismissing Davis’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as to some, but not all, of the named defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Davis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6292 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/26/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6292 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/26/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mack Davis v. Susan Stafford in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 26, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10661911 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →