Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10661064
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Maahnchooh Ghogomu v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
No. 10661064 · Decided August 25, 2025
No. 10661064·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
August 25, 2025
Citation
No. 10661064
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1097 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1097
MAAHNCHOOH DONALD GHOGOMU,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INCORPORATED, Corporate Head
Office (Principal); DAVID FOSTER, PNC General Manager, Customer Public
Relations Office,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Timothy J. Sullivan, Magistrate Judge. (8:24-cv-01083-TJS)
Submitted: August 21, 2025 Decided: August 25, 2025
Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maahnchooh Donald Ghogomu, Appellant Pro Se. Gerard John Emig, GLEASON
FLYNN EMIG MCAFEE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1097 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Maahnchooh Donald Ghogomu appeals the magistrate judge’s order * dismissing for
failure to state a claim his civil complaint alleging intentional infliction of emotional
distress. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ghogomu’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the
magistrate judge’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the order. See Jackson
v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important
document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that
brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s order. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge in accordance with
28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1097 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 25-1097 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
0225-1097 MAAHNCHOOH DONALD GHOGOMU, Plaintiff - Appellant, v.
03THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INCORPORATED, Corporate Head Office (Principal); DAVID FOSTER, PNC General Manager, Customer Public Relations Office, Defendants - Appellees.
04(8:24-cv-01083-TJS) Submitted: August 21, 2025 Decided: August 25, 2025 Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1097 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Maahnchooh Ghogomu v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 25, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10661064 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.