FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10646889
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Lawrence Charles v. David Wozniak

No. 10646889 · Decided August 1, 2025
No. 10646889 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
August 1, 2025
Citation
No. 10646889
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6311 Doc: 32 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-6311 LAWRENCE CHARLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID WOZNIAK, Captain; GARNETT, Lieutenant; WOOMER, Sergeant; LORRAINE GOLDBERG, Detective; KATHERINE GRIMLEY, Deputy; MAJOR GREG AHLEMANN, Field Operation Division; ZILKE, Second Lieutenant; KIMBERLY HOLWAY, Major; TURIN, DFC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:23-cv-00154-CMH-JFA) Submitted: July 29, 2025 Decided: August 1, 2025 Before KING, WYNN, and BERNER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Charles, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6311 Doc: 32 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Lawrence Charles seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part the Defendants’ motion to dismiss. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Charles seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We further grant Charles’s motion to amend the informal brief, and we deny Charles’s motions for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6311 Doc: 32 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6311 Doc: 32 Filed: 08/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Lawrence Charles v. David Wozniak in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 1, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10646889 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →