Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10674511
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Khalil Salahuddin v. Chadwick Dotson
No. 10674511 · Decided September 18, 2025
No. 10674511·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
September 18, 2025
Citation
No. 10674511
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6138 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/18/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6138
KHALIL A. SALAHUDDIN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHADWICK DOTSON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:24-cv-00146-RBS-RJK)
Submitted: August 25, 2025 Decided: September 18, 2025
Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Khalil A. Salahuddin, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Quinlan Adelfio, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6138 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/18/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Khalil A. Salahuddin seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Salahuddin’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254
petition as an unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless
a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing
of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district
court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the
dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of
the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Salahuddin has not
made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6138 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/18/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 25-6138 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/18/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
02(2:24-cv-00146-RBS-RJK) Submitted: August 25, 2025 Decided: September 18, 2025 Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
03Katherine Quinlan Adelfio, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
04Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6138 Doc: 13 Filed: 09/18/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Khalil Salahuddin v. Chadwick Dotson in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on September 18, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10674511 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.