Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10767578
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Karl Malloy v. Kristin Schelin
No. 10767578 · Decided December 30, 2025
No. 10767578·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
December 30, 2025
Citation
No. 10767578
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1208 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1208
KARL LINARD MALLOY,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
KRISTIN E. SCHELIN; MARK A. WATSON,
Creditors - Appellees,
and
CARL M. BATES,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Chief District Judge. (3:24-cv-00828-MHL)
Submitted: December 23, 2025 Decided: December 30, 2025
Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karl Linard Malloy, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Lawrence Perkins, ECKERT
SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Carl Martin Bates, CARL
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1208 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 2 of 3
M. BATES, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1208 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Karl Linard Malloy appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of
jurisdiction his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying confirmation of his
proposed Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. See Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank, 575 U.S. 496, 498-99 (2015) (holding that an order
denying Chapter 13 plan confirmation is not immediately appealable). Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Malloy v. Schelin, No. 3:24-cv-00828-MHL (E.D. Va.
Jan. 30, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1208 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 25-1208 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
02(3:24-cv-00828-MHL) Submitted: December 23, 2025 Decided: December 30, 2025 Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
03Christopher Lawrence Perkins, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Carl Martin Bates, CARL USCA4 Appeal: 25-1208 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 2 of 3 M.
04BATES, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1208 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Karl Malloy v. Kristin Schelin in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 30, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10767578 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.