Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10746105
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Karl Malloy v. Kristin Schelin
No. 10746105 · Decided December 1, 2025
No. 10746105·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
December 1, 2025
Citation
No. 10746105
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2272 Doc: 17 Filed: 12/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2272
KARL LINARD MALLOY,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
KRISTIN E. SCHELIN; MARK A. WATSON,
Creditors - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00170-MHL)
Submitted: November 25, 2025 Decided: December 1, 2025
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karl Linard Malloy, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Lawrence Perkins, ECKERT
SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2272 Doc: 17 Filed: 12/01/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Karl Linard Malloy appeals the district court’s order dismissing as moot his appeal
from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion for a protective order requiring
waivers and an indemnity agreement prior to the scheduled property inspections. The
district court dismissed the appeal as moot because the inspections had occurred and
therefore it “[wa]s without the power to afford effective relief.” Cent. States, Se. & Sw.
Areas Pension Fund v. Cent. Transp., Inc., 841 F.2d 92, 96 (4th Cir. 1988). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. Malloy v. Schelin, No. 3:24-cv-00170-MHL (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2024). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2272 Doc: 17 Filed: 12/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 24-2272 Doc: 17 Filed: 12/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
02(3:24-cv-00170-MHL) Submitted: November 25, 2025 Decided: December 1, 2025 Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
03Christopher Lawrence Perkins, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
04Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2272 Doc: 17 Filed: 12/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Karl Malloy v. Kristin Schelin in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 1, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10746105 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.