FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10746105
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Karl Malloy v. Kristin Schelin

No. 10746105 · Decided December 1, 2025
No. 10746105 · Fourth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
December 1, 2025
Citation
No. 10746105
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2272 Doc: 17 Filed: 12/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-2272 KARL LINARD MALLOY, Debtor - Appellant, v. KRISTIN E. SCHELIN; MARK A. WATSON, Creditors - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00170-MHL) Submitted: November 25, 2025 Decided: December 1, 2025 Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karl Linard Malloy, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Lawrence Perkins, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-2272 Doc: 17 Filed: 12/01/2025 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Karl Linard Malloy appeals the district court’s order dismissing as moot his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion for a protective order requiring waivers and an indemnity agreement prior to the scheduled property inspections. The district court dismissed the appeal as moot because the inspections had occurred and therefore it “[wa]s without the power to afford effective relief.” Cent. States, Se. & Sw. Areas Pension Fund v. Cent. Transp., Inc., 841 F.2d 92, 96 (4th Cir. 1988). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Malloy v. Schelin, No. 3:24-cv-00170-MHL (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2272 Doc: 17 Filed: 12/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2272 Doc: 17 Filed: 12/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Karl Malloy v. Kristin Schelin in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 1, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10746105 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →