FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10796410
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jorge Artica-Paz v. Pamela Bondi

No. 10796410 · Decided February 18, 2026
No. 10796410 · Fourth Circuit · 2026 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
February 18, 2026
Citation
No. 10796410
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1166 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/18/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1166 JORGE MIGUEL ARTICA-PAZ, Petitioner, v. PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of An Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: January 26, 2026 Decided: February 18, 2026 Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. ON BRIEF: Eric H. Kirchman, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Yaakov M. Roth, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony C. Payne, Alexander J. Lutz, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1166 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/18/2026 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jose Artica-Paz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and Artica-Paz’s claims and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief on the merits, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Artiza-Paz (B.I.A. Jan. 24, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1166 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/18/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1166 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/18/2026 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jorge Artica-Paz v. Pamela Bondi in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 18, 2026.
Use the citation No. 10796410 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →