Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10626100
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jonathan Vejarano v. Chadwick Dotson
No. 10626100 · Decided July 8, 2025
No. 10626100·Fourth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
July 8, 2025
Citation
No. 10626100
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-7066 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/08/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7066
JONATHAN JULIAN VEJARANO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00430-JAG)
Submitted: June 13, 2025 Decided: July 8, 2025
Before KING and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ashwin Shandilya, WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-7066 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/08/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Julian Vejarano seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on
his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge
issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of
appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on the merits,
a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the
district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vejarano has not
made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Plain English Summary
USCA4 Appeal: 23-7066 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/08/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
Key Points
01USCA4 Appeal: 23-7066 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/08/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
0223-7066 JONATHAN JULIAN VEJARANO, Petitioner - Appellant, v.
03CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
04(3:22-cv-00430-JAG) Submitted: June 13, 2025 Decided: July 8, 2025 Before KING and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Frequently Asked Questions
USCA4 Appeal: 23-7066 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/08/2025 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jonathan Vejarano v. Chadwick Dotson in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 8, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10626100 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.