Home/Case Law/Fourth Circuit/John v. Holmes and Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation v. Jay Eddy, Harris, Upham & Company, John Doe, Martin v. Miller, Thomas W. Rae,m. David Hyman, Walter C. Johnson, William Lucius Cary, and United Statessecurities and Exchange Commission, John v. Holmes, Durward E. Willis, Solo Tire Company, Hydramotive Corporation, Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation, Hydramotive Engineering Corporation Etal. v. United States of America, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, William Lucius Cary, Manuel F. Cohen, Thomas W. Rae, Martin v. Miller
FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 266868
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
John v. Holmes and Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation v. Jay Eddy, Harris, Upham & Company, John Doe, Martin v. Miller, Thomas W. Rae,m. David Hyman, Walter C. Johnson, William Lucius Cary, and United Statessecurities and Exchange Commission, John v. Holmes, Durward E. Willis, Solo Tire Company, Hydramotive Corporation, Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation, Hydramotive Engineering Corporation Etal. v. United States of America, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, William Lucius Cary, Manuel F. Cohen, Thomas W. Rae, Martin v. Miller
No. 266868 · Decided January 18, 1965
No. 266868·Fourth Circuit · 1965·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided
January 18, 1965
Citation
No. 266868
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
Plain English Summary
Plain-English summary coming soon. Read the opinion text below for the current holding.
Key Points
01
02
03
04
Frequently Asked Questions
John v. Holmes and Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation v. Jay Eddy, Harris, Upham & Company, John Doe, Martin v. Miller, Thomas W. Rae,m. David Hyman, Walter C. Johnson, William Lucius Cary, and United Statessecurities and Exchange Commission, John v. Holmes, Durward E. Willis, Solo Tire Company, Hydramotive Corporation, Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation, Hydramotive Engineering Corporation Etal. v. United States of America, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, William Lucius Cary, Manuel F. Cohen, Thomas W. Rae, Martin v. Miller is a decision of the Fourth Circuit. Review the opinion text below for the holding.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for John v. Holmes and Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation v. Jay Eddy, Harris, Upham & Company, John Doe, Martin v. Miller, Thomas W. Rae,m. David Hyman, Walter C. Johnson, William Lucius Cary, and United Statessecurities and Exchange Commission, John v. Holmes, Durward E. Willis, Solo Tire Company, Hydramotive Corporation, Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation, Hydramotive Engineering Corporation Etal. v. United States of America, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, William Lucius Cary, Manuel F. Cohen, Thomas W. Rae, Martin v. Miller in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on January 18, 1965.
Use the citation No. 266868 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.